A Treatise Of Human Nature - 1562 Words

In the third instalment of his famous thesis; A Treatise of Human Nature; Of Morals, David Hume determines that morality is a character trait approved independently of social conventions. He goes on to conclude that morals cannot be derived from reason when reason is inert, and can neither prevent nor produce action or affection. Hamlet (1602), Frankenstein (1823) and The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891) are all consumed by the innate passion that Hume defines as ‘morality’, yet pivot around the social conventions of their respective eras, broadly identified as ‘reason’. While Hamlet is embodied by his tendency to reason and rationality, Victor Frankenstein and Dorian Gray’s conformity to the values of their era functions to illuminate the irrationality of their actions. Hamlet, Frankenstein and Dorian Gray are all protagonists who grapple with the juxtaposition of morality and the values which are outlined by their respective eras as ‘reason’. Oscar Wilde’s Dorian Gray, for example, is a character consumed by the conflict between the aesthetic values that were intrinsic to the Fin de Sià ¨cle, and morality. Indeed, aestheticism offers no distinction between moral and immoral acts, tending explicitly to the pursuit of pleasure. This is demonstrated in Dorian’s superficial relationship with Sibyl Vane. Dorian’s description of his infatuation with Sibyl, ‘I loved you because you were marvellous, because you had genius and intellect, because you realised the dreams of great poetsShow MoreRelatedA Treatise Of Human Nature By David Hume1472 Words   |  6 PagesUp until the time when William Blake, William Wordsworth, and David Hume put pen to paper, the most revolutionary lines of thought regarding science and ph ilosophy came from Isaac Newton and John Locke who described humans as passive receivers of a world of set laws ruling passive atoms. Hume pushes this popular understanding of the self to the brink and ends up claiming that one can never comprehend the self. Blake and Wordsworth both vehemently disagree with Hume and believe the self is knowableRead MoreDavid Hume s A Treatise Of Human Nature907 Words   |  4 PagesThe argument I shall address for this paper is found on page 385, from David Hume’s A Treatise of Human Nature. In Book 1, he takes a skeptic view on the philosophy of personal identity by making the claim that there is no such thing as a self. According to Hume, for there to be a self it must be constant and stable, yet all of our knowledge comes from ‘impressions’ (perceptions that come from sensory experience) that are only fleeting: â€Å"pain and pleasure, grief and joy, passions and sensations succeedRead MoreJohn Locke s Two Treatises Of Gov ernment1345 Words   |  6 PagesInstructor: JC Boucher Date: 24 November 2016 Assignment John Locke’s Two Treatises Of Government Most scholarship that links John Locke’s ideas with eighteenth- century representations of childhood approaches children as Lockean pedagogic subjects ready for moral and intellectual education. My essay instead brings to bear on representation of children Locke the political thinker, who articulates in Two Treatises of Government (1689) a person’s right to â€Å"liberty and property.† Locke’sRead MoreBenjamin Franklin And His Life1281 Words   |  6 Pagesin his life. After he graduated from Westminster, he continued his studies at the Christ Church in Oxford. Locke was very successful at Oxford, and later got his undergraduate degree. One of Locke’s important works was the Essays on the Law of Nature, which his teachings helped him develop this work. Most of Lock’s time at Oxford was spent studying natural philosophy and medicine. John then left Oxford and headed to London in 1667, where he had settled with the Anthony Ashle y Cooper family.Read MoreEssay On the Obligation to Keep One’s Promises1395 Words   |  6 Pagesdifferent way than Kant. In his Treatise of Human Nature, Hume devotes an entire subsection to the issue. He enters his discussion by attempting to define what exactly a promise is, and what motivates people to keep it. Hume begins by stating what a promise is not. â€Å"A promise is not intelligible naturally, nor antecedent to human conventions; and that a man, unacquainted with society, could never enter into any engagements with another.† (Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, pg516)2. More specificallyRead MoreAnalysis Of Aristotle s The Leviathan Essay1586 Words   |  7 Pagesonce wrote in his novel Politics, â€Å"Man is by nature a social animal; an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human. Society is something that precedes the individual. Anyone who either cannot lead the common life or is so self-sufficient as not to need to, and therefore does not partake of society, is either a beast or a god. † (Aristotle 4) Dating back to Ancient Greece, the state of nature has been observed and disputed for centuriesRead MoreNiccolo Machiavelli s The Prince1699 Words   |  7 Pagesperceived more as derisive description than an accurate representation of that person’s philosophical views of power. This popular depiction is due to Niccolo Machiavelli’s harsh portrayal of the interlaced relationship between power and politics in his treatise, The Prince. Machiavelli begins his work by contending that it is â€Å"more effective† to reveal the â€Å"practical truth of a subject† rather than â€Å"depend on [his] fancies for it†(Machiavelli 2524). His rejection of idealism and focus on realism impelsRead MoreJohn Locke: Founding Father of Modern Era Liberalism1444 Words   |  6 Pagesphilosopher’s ideology, we can identify which thinke r’s theory reflected modern era liberalism the most. For this paper I will be arguing that, John Locke provides a more compelling framework of modern era liberalism because of his perception of the state of nature, the social contract and the function of government. Before explaining how Locke’s philosophy reflects modern liberalism, it is important to first understand the characteristics that make up modern liberalism. Modern era liberalism stresses theRead MoreEssay about The Role of Property598 Words   |  3 PagesThe Role of Property In the seventeenth-century, England was recovering from the Glorious Revolution and political thought centered on the issues of nature and the limits of government. Two great political thinkers, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes took a scientific approach to analyze government and focused on the state of nature and natural rights of individuals. Locke was particularly interested in property and governments role in the protection of property. He believed that God gave theRead MoreCompare and Contrast Hobbes’s and Locke’s Views of the State of Nature and the Fundamental Purpose of Political Society. Whose View Is the More Plausible? Why?1564 Words   |  7 PagesCompare and contrast Hobbes’s and Locke’s views of the state of nature and the fundamental purpose of political society. Whose view is the more plausible? Why? Introduction Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both natural law theorists and social contracts theorists. While most natural law theorists have predominantly been of the opinion that humans are social animals by nature, Locke and Hobbes had a different perspective. Their points of view were remarkably different from those

Economical Effect of Michael Jordan Free Essays

I had originally planned to write a paper on Michael Jordan’s economical effect on today’s sports in America. I had even researched and written two pages before I stopped and realized that I would like to instead discuss Michael Jordan’s life and mystical career. Over the last twenty years Michael Jordan has captivated and awed me with his brilliant success both on and off the basketball court. We will write a custom essay sample on Economical Effect of Michael Jordan or any similar topic only for you Order Now I have wanted for some time to write about him and try to rationalize his seemingly unbelievable life and this paper has given me a chance. The legend began in 1981 with seventeen seconds left on the clock and seventeen feet between Michael and the basket. It was a shot any coach drawing up a play for a talented player for the final shot would die for. He knocked it in and North Carolina had its first National championship. Even though North Carolina had the best college player in the country in James Worthy and other great stars in Sam Perkins and Matt Doherty, it was the scrawny freshman who had come on the scene that year to become the first Carolina freshman to ever start that took the biggest shot in the program’s history. It was Michael Jordan who was the man that night and he was determined either consciously or unconsciously to never let anyone question who the man is again. Michael went on to become two-time national college player of the year and in 1999, was voted the greatest college basketball player ever. (CNN/Sports Illustrated) After his junior year, having accomplished everything possible for a college player, Michael decided to turn professional. (He later completed his degree taking summer school courses) But first he would go on to dominated the 1984 Olympics and lead the United States to the gold medal. It could be left up to Spanish Olympian Fernando Martin to sum up the Michael Jordan phenomenon, circa 1984. â€Å"Michael Jordan? † he asked. â€Å"Jump, jump, jump. Very quick. Very fast. Very, very good. Jump, jump, jump. † No NBA scouting report could have been more pertinent. By the time Michael detonated on the league in 1984, he had sprouted from a precocious and exciting young talent into a full-fledged human event. As his rookie season marched on, Jordan upstaged proven giants like Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, and Dr. J. and already was becoming the first player to transcend team affiliation on the road. Fan’s didn’t come out to see their hometown heroes beat the Bulls; they bought tickets to watch Michael Jordan fly. In his rookie year Michael averaged an astonishing 28. 2 points per game (third overall) and was selected to the all-star game. He also led the team to the playoffs for the first time in four years. A feat he would continue to ensure every year of his career. It was in his second year that Jordan’s bitter relationship with Bulls general manager Jerry Krause and owner Jerry Reinsdorf began. Michael had broken his foot three games into the season and had spent the next months rehabilitating in order to come back as soon as possible. When he was finally healthy to play the Bulls record was 24-43. Michael believed that the team could still make the playoffs and was excited for the challenge. Krause and Reinsdorf had other ideas. They wanted to keep Michael from playing so that they could keep losing and secure a place in the draft lottery. To someone as competitive as Michael Jordan, this idea was simply sinful. It meant that the people who employed him were not as committed to winning as he was, that they accepted the idea of defeat as he did not, and that they were wiling to bag the current season and any chance at the playoffs in order to improve their roster for the future. Even on a bad team with marginal players like the early Bulls, the remarkable thing about Michael Jordan was that he never accepted the idea of defeat. He believed that as long as he played, the Bulls could make the playoffs, and that if he got there, he could carry them on to victory. Management finally did let him play and the Bulls did make the playoffs where they faced the best team in the league, the Boston Celtics. It was the stage that Michael lived for and he took full advantage. Although the Bulls were swept by the eventual champions, Michael’s fame and notoriety had a quantum increase after the series. No one was really prepared for what happened. In the first game Michael came out blistering and scored forty-nine points. A great performance against the top defensive team in the league, but not extraordinary. In the second game Michael performed at a playoff level that no one had witnessed before. The CBS sports broadcast seemed more like a personal highlight reel than an actual game. By the end of the double overtime war, he’d hit for 63 points, the most points ever scored in playoff history. Celtic Danny Ainge later said, â€Å"We knew when we had gone into the game that he was very good, but none of us knew yet that he was going to be the best player who ever laced up sneakers, but we were in the process of learning it, and that afternoon was a good beginning. Perhaps Larry Bird, the MVP of the league at the time, put it best, â€Å"That was god disguised as Michael Jordan. † In his rookie year Michael already had become one of the top product endorser in the league. He had signed a then unheard of contract with Nike that paid him $250,000 a year for five years with an annuity, incentives, and royalties on all Nike basketball related items. Michael had originally wanted to sign with Addidas even if they offered him less money than Nike, but Nike threw in the kicker. They offered to name a shoe after him. The first Air Jordan shoe was a high-top black and red shoe. Three games into the season, the NBA did Michael and Nike a huge favor. The league banned the shoe because it didn’t conform to the rest of the Bulls uniform. Michael continued to wear the shoe and the league subsequently fined him $5,000 a game. Nike didn’t blink. They paid every penny and Michael continued to wear the shoe. It would have cost millions of dollars to come up with a promotion that produced as much publicity as the league’s ban did. The first commercial showed Jordan’s head, and the camera slowly moved down his body to his feet. When the camera hit the shoes a big â€Å"X† was stamped on the screen and the announcer said, â€Å"Banned†. After that sales went crazy. But it was Michael’s third year when his remarkable qualities where able to be portrayed through the television. Nike had hired a little known film producer named Spike Lee to direct Michael in commercials. The commercials that they make together were able to show Michael’s innate charm and wit, and his obvious confidence. He knew who he was and liked who he was. There was nothing threatening about him. He was judgmental- you had to win his respect, and he was clearly shrewd about how he was used- but there was an innate coolness and elegance about him. If this was not yet expressed in anything he said, it was self evident in the smile, in the deft facial gestures, in the ability to roll his eyebrows at just the right moment. He was good looking, he was likable, he had that luminescent smile, and he was the greatest basketball player in the world. The Nike commercials were so good, that they fed on themselves and inspired other companies such as McDonald’s, Coke, Hanes, Gatorade, Wilson, and Ballpark Franks among many others to do comparable commercials. And so it was that a true American icon was born. Michael continued for the next three years to grow in both his basketball achievements and his fame. Michael won every single individual basketball award possible and was already considered one of the best players in the history of the game. And outside of basketball the public became more and more fond of him. But in his mind and the mind of many others, Michael was missing something. A championship. For years Michael had carried a seemingly inferior team to the brink, only to succumb to either the great Celtic teams of the early 80’s, or the great Pistons, led by Isaah Thomas, in the late 80’s. But in 1991 the basketball world could no longer contain Michael Jordan’s destiny. After the first championship against the Lakers and Magic Johnson, Michael’s fame again skyrocketed. He went from being the most famous athlete in America to being the most famous person in America. By the time Michael had claimed his third championship in a row, his notoriety transcended not only sports but American culture. He was unquestionably the most well known human on the planet. More famous in many distant parts of the globe than the President of The United States. American journalists and diplomats on assignment to the most rural parts of Asia and Africa were often stunned when they visited small villages to find young children wearing tattered replicas of Michael Jordan’s Bulls jersey. Michael Jordan’s life from 1980 to 1993 was that of a storybook. The success that he achieved in that short time frame quit possibly is unparallel in American history. But at the same time it seemed possible by a very unique and gifted individual. However, the events that occurred in Michael Jordan’s life from 1994-1999, in my and many others opinion, at times do not seem possible and in fact almost immortal. You could almost get a sense watching him over the years that you were not in fact witnessing a real story, but one made of fiction. As if all the major media sources in the world got together and decided to concoct this seemingly unbelievable human that never seems to fail. To put the success that Michael Jordan achieved in the last six years in the proper perspective would significantly increase the length of this paper so I would like to instead let some well known others describe Michael Jordan. Harry Edwards, a sociologist at the University of California, talks about Jordan representing the highest level of human achievement, on the order of Gandhi, Einstein, or Michelangelo. If, he added, he were in charge of introducing an alien being â€Å"to the epitome of human potential, creativity, perseverance, and spirit, I would introduce that alien life to Michael Jordan. Doug Collins, once spoke of Jordan belonging to that rarest category of people who are so far above the norm, men like Einstein and Edison, that they were identifiable geniuses. Jordan’s talented teammate B. J. Armstrong, frustrated in his early years with the Bulls by his failure to rise to Jordan’s level and apparent expectations, had gone to the library and checked out a series of books on geniuses to see if there was anything he might learn about how to deal with Jordan. He’s god’s child,† teammate Wes Matthews said in Jordan’s first year. And there were a number of players more talented than Matthews who agreed. â€Å"Jesus in Nikes,† in the words of Jayson Williams of the Nets. After Jordan led the Bulls to their second title, Larry bird said that there had never been an athlete like Jordan. I think author Scott Turow says it best, â€Å"Michael Jordan plays basketball better than anyone else in the world does anything else. â€Å" How to cite Economical Effect of Michael Jordan, Essay examples

Nature View Farm Case Analysis free essay sample

ANALYSIS OF NATUREVIEW FARM CASE : SUBMITTED BY: MUZAMIL QUADIR ROLL NO. PB1108 Natureview Farm, a Vermont based producer of organic Yogurt with $13 million in revenues is the leading natural Yogurt brand(24% market share) sold into natural food stores. It has achieved this through its special Yogurt manufacturing process through cultivating personal relationships with dairy buyers in the natural food channel set in 2000, when the company faces financial pressure to grow revenues to $20 million by the end of 2001, due to a planned exit by its venture capital investors. The intermediate decision point that the protogonist, Natureviews vice president of marketing, faces is whether to achieve this revenue growyh by expanding into supermarket channel. INCOME STATEMENT, 1999 COST OF GOODS SOLD = 890000 GROSS PROFIT = 4810000 EXPENSES = 4550000 NET INCOME = 260000 YOGURT MARKET SHARE BY PACKAGING 8oz______________________________________74%(3%growth) hildren multipack__________________________9%(12. 5%growth) 32oz__________________________________________8%(2%growth) Other__________________________________________9%(NC) AVERAGE RETAIL PRICE($) PACKAGE| ARP IN NATURAL FOOD CHANNEL| ARP IN SUPERMARKET CHANNEL| 8oz| 0. We will write a custom essay sample on Nature View Farm Case Analysis or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page 88| 0. 74| 32oz| 3. 19| 2. 7| 4oz multipack| 3. 35| 2. 85| GOAL: â€Å"Uniquely positioned the product to capitalize on the growing trend in atural and organic foods in supermarket† MARKET NEWS: â€Å"Bellini heard rumours that one of the Natureviews major natural competitor would soon try to expand into supermarket channel† MARKET POTENTIAL: A)Industry expert predicting unit volume growth of organic Yogurt at supermarket of 20% per year from 2001 to 2006. B)These predictions were relative to unit growth projection of 2% to 4% of Yogurt category in the supermarket. DIRECT COMPETITORS| CURRENT PERFORMANCE| STRENGTHS WEAKNESS| IMAGE| CURRENT STRATEGY| NATUREVIEW| 24% market(natural food channel)$13 million revenues| Longer shelf lifeOnly in natural food stores| QualityHealthyUnique taste| Build relationshipsGenerate revenue| DANNON| 33% market shareMany flavors products| Market leaderArtificial| High visibilitySomething for everyone| Follow consumer trends| YOPLAIT| 24% market shareMany products flavors| Brand nameArtifical| Caring brand | Make gains on DannonDifferentiation| COLUMBO| 50% combined market share| National Distribution| Good for you| Motivation| EXPAND PRODUCT LINE RO INCLUDE YOGURT MULTIPLE PACKS Natureview Farm should expand its already successful organic yogurt product line to include to versions of a Yogurt multipack priced at $3. 35 each. The strategy will allow the company to reach their set revenue goal the quickest due to the fact that the annual growth rate of sales of Yogurt multipacks is 12. % versus only 3% for the 6oz size and 2% for 8oz size The profit margins from multipacks are also significantly higher than those of single servings. Flavors will be chosen from lines most successful flavors but will be given creative names that will be appeal to kids. He multipacks will be positioned as the healthy snack alternative for kids.